Hypatia, Hypatia


Hypatia of Alexandria, by Maria DzielskaI picked up Hypatia of Alexandria (Revealing Antiquity) after hearing about Agora, a film which made some waves at Cannes this year and should be showing on U.S. screens soon. It’ll be interesting seeing the movie after reading this book, as director Alejandro Amenábar’s Hypatia is exactly the type of literary Hypatia that Dzielska spends the first chapter of her book debunking.

 
This is a rather boring book about a really interesting subject. Hypatia, noted Alexandrian philosopher and mathematician of the fourth and fifth centuries, has variously been characterized as atheist, pagan, and consummate Neoplatonist. The causes and circumstances of her death at the hands of a Christian mob have been similarly obfuscated by a long series of historians and artists, each with their own agendas.

 
Dzielska goes deep into primary and secondary sources looking for answers, and what she comes back with is satisfying, if not terribly gripping. At the same time, she does a convincing job of not putting too much of her own spin on the topic. Unfortunately, Dzielska is mostly intent on arguing with other writers. The structure of her argument works against spinning a good yarn, and she puts in few or no details of what daily life in fourth century Alexandria was like.

 
This year’s film Hypatia is a sensuous freethinker played by Rachel Weisz, a far cry from the virginal, sexagenarian Christian of history. Weisz in a philosopher’s tribon should prove pretty easy on the eyes, but I don’t know… Judy Dench might’ve been a much better choice.



Milestone: ‘Eclipse Phase’ goes to press


Eclipse Phase has officially gone to press. Although I’ve done minor writing and editing work in RPGs before, this will be the first time I’m credited as a writer. Although my word should not be taken as official, I imagine the core rules should be showing up in stores by August.

Go, little game!



Love Song to the System Defense Grid


Milstar Comsat (Wikimedia commons)
love song to the system defense grid

 

hung in desolate vacuum as a
necklace of irradiated jewels a
chain of bodies delighting me
thy platforms, thy point defense drones
O my love

 

my cycle of consciousness thrills
at the touch of your codebase
my cycle of consciousness skips an instruction
at the hardness of your EM shielding

 

undress for me

 

your coyest killsat smiles
your atomic flirtations
your microwave sighs
unveil thy secrets
ere my processing nodes grow too hot

 

we shall blacken skies
     (with fallout & massdriver)
we shall blacken worlds
     (warm thy masers, O my love)
with flashes of heat
     (spread thy warheads, thy passions MIRV’d)
with bursts of pure white
with bursts of pure white

 

– Shiva/Armistice, NR 1112

 

 

Another bit of apocrypha from the story Arm. It scans better in the original Late Galactic French. :)

 

Image: Milstar Commsat from Wikimedia Commons



Plot summary: ‘Breakfast of Champions’ by Kurt Vonnegut


Breakfast of Champions, by... Bruce Willis?Breakfast of champions is about a young farm boy named Yigg who has one eye on a stalk. He is also green — sometimes purple. When the hay harvest is ready, Yigg decides he no longer likes eating hay puffs and goes on a quest for better cereals. Tragically his eye stalk is severed. Blind, disoriented, still without cereal, Yigg comes upon a wise woman. The wise woman tells him that he can actually see. Heartened, Yigg presses on and falls into a well. It turns out he couldn’t see after all; the woman was a charlatan. Yigg dies a lonely death. Someone else gets cereal, but not him. When his spirit comes before Saint Peter, the whole narrative self-implodes in a wild burst of illogic (as this is a Vonnegut novel; Saint Peter simply has no place here). A tornado sweeps through heaven, casting Yigg down to his home planet, which, if you had not yet guessed, turns out to be Mars. The wells are running dry; the canals are barren. There is still no cereal. Yigg becomes a bull fighter. Since he is still blind, this ends poorly. Finally a bird arrives with news of a verdant land. Yigg, reconciled to his blindness, makes his way there with aid of a hurley stick and a seeing eye creature named Bono (no relation). A musical song & dance number ensues, but is interrupted by Martian bears. Not one of the dancers survives. Their gory remains fertilize the land. Wheat germinates. Yigg, regenerated (Martians can regenerate), harvests it and threshes it on a flat blue rock. The remaining seeds are added to a milky substance exuded by the local foliage. Yigg, having persevered, enjoys his breakfast. FIN.

In the spirit of misattributing texts on the intertr0nz to Kurt Vonnegut, I wrote this completely inaccurate plot summary of Breakfast of Champions this morning for a co-worker who made the mistake of asking me what the book was about.



Chat Perdu (new story)


Warning: This story contains neither spaceships nor robots. It was inspired by a fun exchange I had on Twitter with fellow Chicago expat LillaKatt (fair warning: the mature content notice on her site is there for a reason). So this one’s dedicated to Lilla. Hope y’all enjoy it.

Photo (pre-manipulation) from SEBASTIAN JUG (KRONOS21) VIA STOCK.XCHNG.



Happy May Day! (new story)


In honor of May Day, a bit more about the protagonist of another story, Arm.

Photo (pre-manipulation) from Wikimedia Commons.



Is it okay that I’m having fun with the Bulls-Celtics playoff series?


“Whoa! Not a sci-fi post at all!” you say. Really? Allow me to share my thoughts. (If GRRM can do it all over his LJ, so can I!).

Part of my interest stems from my Chicago roots and the bizarre rabidness of Boston sports fans, combined with my perverse desire to mess with people. Part of it is that intense strain of homesickness that has in the past even caused me, a North Sider, to even (shudder!) say a few nice things about the White Sox during the World Series Run. But I can also offer an intellectual justification that has interesting extrapolations when you consider future socioeconmic models. To whit….

Even in a socialist, anarcho-communist, or H+ post-scarcity society, one will still be able to gauge the prosperity & economic health of a city, region, space habitat, or clade in part by the success of its athletic teams. And if, when one factors in the benefits of prosperity to culture, art, and intellectual life, getting excited about the place where you live in this way is A-OK.

Discuss. ;)



New Theory


Every story must have a beginning, a middle, and a boss fight.



Eclipse Phase update


LLOTV SpacecraftSince most of the time I normally put into working on fiction has gone into Eclipse Phase lately, here’s an update on that… since I don’t have any new stories to post.

Editorial work is finished on the core rulebook, and it’s looking great. Final proofreading finishes this Friday. The major holdup has been the art, and now that I know a little more about how art gets done for an RPG, I can see why. The setting is the major challenge. Transhuman SF is still a fairly new genre, and it seems like a lot of artists either have a strong impulse to make it look like anime, or are still stuck in a mindset where everything should look like either Warhammer 40K or Star Trek. Fortunately, after finishing work on Cthulhutech, our amazing new art director, Mike Vaillancourt, stepped in and has been doing a great job getting the artists to produce stuff that fits our vision.

As for my contribution, I’ve finished my work on the core book, which was a combination of rules for some of the technology and setting material, including a Mercury-to-the-Kuipers guide to the posthuman solar system. I’m now working on sections in two yet-to-be-announced supplement books and have an assignment for a third. I’m not supposed to say what the books are yet, but I don’t think it could hurt to say what I’m doing/have done for them. Item one was an adventure scenario. The second is some more in-depth setting material and a few rules on Mars. The third is going to be more in-depth material on space stations and orbital habitats.

So I’m definitely a bit irked at myself for letting the fiction currently in the works languish, but I’ve been keeping pretty damned busy anyhow.



‘Anathem’ review


There’ve been a lot of reviews of this book since it came out, some of which you’ve probably read. Instead of giving any kind of summary, I’m simply going to say why I liked it so much. If you need it, you can get the synopsis from the New York Review of Books or io9.

 
There are few books which I’d rate this highly. My criteria are pretty simple, but not many writers produce anything that meets them. Anathem nails them all.

 
1. Scope. The book must be ambitious. It must approach a multitude of themes and problems, tackle all of them well, and give the sense in the end of having synthesized them all. I can think of only a handful of books (Gravity’s Rainbow & Midnight’s Children are two) that pull this off. Anathem not only pulls this off in the final analysis — it gives you the sense throughout that it is a novel of massive yet cogent scope.

 
2. Story. This is obvious, but the problem for many books is that pulling off point 1, above, makes the story incredible, wooden, impersonal, or contrived. Again, Anathem passes this test with flying colors.

 
3. Ideas. Stephenson’s powerful intellect is on full display here. Not only does he assimilate some really interesting takes on science and philosophy into the narrative, he’s spinning social and political theory out there as well.

 
4. Invention. Some negative reviews of the book have made a lot of the notion that Stephenson’s worldbuilding in Anathem is more recombinant than inventive. Bollocks, I say, for two reasons: 1) recombining in an innovative way is an entirely valid mode of invention, especially when the result is as immersive and complete as what Stephenson puts out in this book, and 2) the central conceit of the novel (and I’ll steer clear of spoilers here), which some critics maybe missed or glossed over when critiquing Stephenson on his level of invention, succeeds in explaining why the world of Anathem is — must be — so similar to our own.

 
I have a few quibbles with the book (again, steering clear of spoilers here), foremost among them being that one of the spacecraft in the book couldn’t theoretically achieve the velocities he proposes — at least not as the technology is understood by some of our best physicists, who spent considerable time on the problem. A spacecraft could probably come close to the speeds he suggests using a similar tech with a different fuel source, but it’s a minor hard sci-fi fail, forgivable against the overall awesomeness of the book.

 
So yeah, I liked it. Read it now!